Competitor profile

Gitamoni Saikia

They win 30% of what they bid, and 22% of the value they chase.

10tenders on record
5buyer authorities
1state
26 Feb 2026last award
Total bids
10
10 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
3
5 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹65.9 L
of ₹2.9 Cr bid — 22.5% conversion
Win rate
30.0%
of 10 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count10 bids
30.0%
20.0%
50.0%
Awarded330.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected220.0%
Lost550.0%
By value₹2.9 Cr
22.5%
24.3%
53.2%
Awarded₹65.9 L22.5%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹71.3 L24.3%
Lost₹1.6 Cr53.2%

Where they win

3 authorities · 1 state

Operating states

LowHigh
Assam₹65.9 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
ARUP JYOTI MAJUMDAR0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
02
DNA INFRASTRUCTURE0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
03
M/S B.K.ENTERPRISE0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
04
SUKANYA HATIMURIA1 win · 1 shared tender
₹41.6 L
won head-to-head
05
DAL THOMS SCIENTIFIC0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
06
Shri Sai Enterprise0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedGitamoni Saikia awardedOthers

About Gitamoni Saikia

Gitamoni Saikia appears as a bidder on 10 government tenders on record, from 5 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 10 decided bids, it was awarded 3 — a 30.0% win rate — worth ₹65.9 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 26 Feb 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is National Health Mission, at 62.4% of what it has won, out of 3 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Assam. On priced bids, its median quote is 2.9% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against ARUP JYOTI MAJUMDAR, DNA INFRASTRUCTURE and M/S B.K.ENTERPRISE. ARUP JYOTI MAJUMDAR bid on 1 of the same tender and won 0 of them; Gitamoni Saikia won 0.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.