Competitor profile

Girraj-Girraj const. co.

They win 50% of what they bid — and 69% of the value, so the bids they miss are the smaller ones.

8tenders on record
1buyer authority
1state
26 Jul 2016last award
Total bids
8
8 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
4
4 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹26.6 Cr
of ₹38.8 Cr bid — 68.6% conversion
Win rate
50.0%
of 8 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count8 bids
50.0%
50.0%
Awarded450.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost450.0%
By value₹38.8 Cr
68.6%
31.4%
Awarded₹26.6 Cr68.6%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹12.2 Cr31.4%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh
Rajasthan₹26.6 Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
BABU LAL-M/S BABU LAL1 win · 1 shared tender
₹88.4 L
won head-to-head
02
₹0
won head-to-head
03
₹0
won head-to-head
04
BADRI LAL CHOUDHARY1 win · 1 shared tender
₹1.3 Cr
won head-to-head
05
₹0
won head-to-head
06
Suresh Dhaker0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedGirraj-Girraj awardedOthers

Recent tenders awarded to Girraj-Girraj

About Girraj-Girraj const. co.

Girraj-Girraj const. co. appears as a bidder on 8 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority in 1 state. Of its 8 decided bids, it was awarded 4 — a 50.0% win rate — worth ₹26.6 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 26 Jul 2016.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Rajasthan Housing Board - CE, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Rajasthan. On priced bids, its median quote is 0.3% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against BABU LAL-M/S BABU LAL, BHUSHAN LAL SHARMA-M/S AROMA INDUSTRIES LIMITED and ASHOK KUMAR MAHNOT-M/s Ashok Kumar Mahnot. BABU LAL-M/S BABU LAL bid on 1 of the same tender and won 1 of them; Girraj-Girraj const. co. won 0.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.