Competitor profile

GAUR ASSOCIATES

They win 20% of what they bid, but only 2% of the value — the bigger bids get away.

5tenders on record
2buyer authorities
1state
28 Jul 2026last award
Total bids
5
5 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
1
3 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹3.9 L
of ₹1.7 Cr bid — 2.4% conversion
Win rate
20.0%
of 5 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count5 bids
20.0%
20.0%
60.0%
Awarded120.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected120.0%
Lost360.0%
By value₹1.7 Cr
95.7%
Awarded₹3.9 L2.3%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹3.3 L2.0%
Lost₹1.6 Cr95.7%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh
Haryana₹3.9 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
OBTUSE DESIGN STUDIO4 wins · 5 shared tenders
₹1.3 Cr
won head-to-head
02
N.K. Consultancy Pvt. Ltd.0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
03
Tech Pecific0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
04
CREATIVE DESIGN GROUP0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
05
₹0
won head-to-head
06
STRUCRETE CONSULTING0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedGAUR ASSOCIATES awardedOthers

Recent tenders awarded to GAUR ASSOCIATES

About GAUR ASSOCIATES

GAUR ASSOCIATES appears as a bidder on 5 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 5 decided bids, it was awarded 1 — a 20.0% win rate — worth ₹3.9 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 28 Jul 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Haryana Board Corporation, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Haryana. On priced bids, its median quote is 16.9% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against OBTUSE DESIGN STUDIO, N.K. Consultancy Pvt. Ltd. and Tech Pecific. OBTUSE DESIGN STUDIO bid on 5 of the same tenders and won 4 of them; GAUR ASSOCIATES won 1.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.