Competitor profile

GARGI DEVELOPERS

They win 11% of what they bid, and 18% of the value they chase.

10tenders on record
4buyer authorities
1state
27 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
9
10 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
1
4 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹15.0 Cr
of ₹82.4 Cr bid — 18.2% conversion
Win rate
11.1%
of 9 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count9 bids
11.1%
44.4%
44.4%
Awarded111.1%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected444.4%
Lost444.4%
By value₹82.4 Cr
18.2%
73.8%
Awarded₹15.0 Cr18.2%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹6.6 Cr8.0%
Lost₹60.8 Cr73.8%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Public Works Region₹15.0 Cr100.0%

Operating states

LowHigh
Maharashtra₹15.0 Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
M/S SHRI AMBABAI CONSTRUCTION3 wins · 5 shared tenders
₹9.4 Cr
won head-to-head
02
M/s.Kiran constructions0 wins · 5 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
DATTA UDBUKE0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
M/S NUSRAT CONSTRUCTION COMPANY2 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹43.4 Cr
won head-to-head
05
ARADHYA CONSTRUCTION DEGLOOR0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
VISHANT KISHOR AGRAWAL1 win · 2 shared tenders
₹1.9 Cr
won head-to-head
Rival awardedGARGI DEVELOPERS awardedOthers

About GARGI DEVELOPERS

GARGI DEVELOPERS appears as a bidder on 10 government tenders on record, from 4 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 9 decided bids, it was awarded 1 — a 11.1% win rate — worth ₹15.0 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 27 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Public Works Region, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Maharashtra. On priced bids, its median quote is 5.5% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against M/S SHRI AMBABAI CONSTRUCTION, M/s.Kiran constructions and DATTA UDBUKE. M/S SHRI AMBABAI CONSTRUCTION bid on 5 of the same tenders and won 3 of them; GARGI DEVELOPERS won 0.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.