Competitor profile

Garg Construction

They win 20% of what they bid, and 18% of the value they chase.

10tenders on record
2buyer authorities
1state
19 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
10
10 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
2
8 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹52.8 L
of ₹3.0 Cr bid — 17.8% conversion
Win rate
20.0%
of 10 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count10 bids
20.0%
80.0%
Awarded220.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost880.0%
By value₹3.0 Cr
17.8%
82.2%
Awarded₹52.8 L17.8%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹2.4 Cr82.2%

Where they win

2 authorities · 1 state

Operating states

LowHigh
Uttar Pradesh₹52.8 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
NARINDER KUMAR CONSTRUCTIONS5 wins · 5 shared tenders
₹61.2 L
won head-to-head
02
M/S MITTAL CONSTRUCTION CO.0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
03
V S ENTERPRISES1 win · 1 shared tender
₹60.6 L
won head-to-head
04
M/S RAJAT ENTERPRISES0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
05
M/S SAHIB CONSTRUCTION WORKS1 win · 1 shared tender
₹37.0 L
won head-to-head
06
Ashok Kumar Gupta Contractor1 win · 1 shared tender
₹83.5 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedGarg Construction awardedOthers

About Garg Construction

Garg Construction appears as a bidder on 10 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 10 decided bids, it was awarded 2 — a 20.0% win rate — worth ₹52.8 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 19 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is U.P. State Construction and Infrastructure Development Corporation Ltd., at 92.1% of what it has won, out of 2 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Uttar Pradesh. On priced bids, its median quote is 0.1% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against NARINDER KUMAR CONSTRUCTIONS, M/S MITTAL CONSTRUCTION CO. and V S ENTERPRISES. NARINDER KUMAR CONSTRUCTIONS bid on 5 of the same tenders and won 5 of them; Garg Construction won 0.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.