Competitor profile

GANPATI INFRACON

They win 12% of what they bid — and 37% of the value, so the bids they miss are the smaller ones.

17tenders on record
2buyer authorities
1state
2 Jul 2026last award
Total bids
17
17 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
2
15 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹89.3 L
of ₹2.4 Cr bid — 37.2% conversion
Win rate
11.8%
of 17 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count17 bids
11.8%
88.2%
Awarded211.8%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost1588.2%
By value₹2.4 Cr
37.2%
62.8%
Awarded₹89.3 L37.2%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹1.5 Cr62.8%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh
Uttar Pradesh₹89.3 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
R M CONSTRUCTIONS10 wins · 11 shared tenders
₹22.3 L
won head-to-head
02
VINOD SARASWAT1 win · 11 shared tenders
₹24.0 L
won head-to-head
03
FRIENDS EARTH MOVERS1 win · 3 shared tenders
₹79.6 L
won head-to-head
04
MGH CONSTRUCTION0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
M/S bajarang contractor2 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹8.7 L
won head-to-head
06
M/s Bhanu Prakash Thekedaar1 win · 1 shared tender
₹13.6 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedGANPATI INFRACON awardedOthers

About GANPATI INFRACON

GANPATI INFRACON appears as a bidder on 17 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 17 decided bids, it was awarded 2 — a 11.8% win rate — worth ₹89.3 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 2 Jul 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Directorate of Local Bodies UP, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Uttar Pradesh. On priced bids, its median quote is 3.1% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against R M CONSTRUCTIONS, VINOD SARASWAT and FRIENDS EARTH MOVERS. R M CONSTRUCTIONS bid on 11 of the same tenders and won 10 of them; GANPATI INFRACON won 0.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.