Competitor profile

FURNITURE SELECTION HOUSE

They win 50% of what they bid, but only 22% of the value — the bigger bids get away.

5tenders on record
3buyer authorities
1state
22 Sept 2023last award
Total bids
4
5 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
2
2 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹25.9 L
of ₹1.2 Cr bid — 21.8% conversion
Win rate
50.0%
of 4 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count4 bids
50.0%
50.0%
Awarded250.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost250.0%
By value₹1.2 Cr
21.8%
78.2%
Awarded₹25.9 L21.8%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹93.0 L78.2%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

RSMML₹25.9 L100.0%

Operating states

LowHigh
Rajasthan₹25.9 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
AK JAIN AND ASSOCAITES0 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
02
S. S. Enterprises0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
Samridhi Associates1 win · 2 shared tenders
₹53.0 L
won head-to-head
04
₹0
won head-to-head
05
Rashmi Enterprises0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
06
M/s Jai Krishna Builders0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedFURNITURE SELECTION awardedOthers

Recent tenders awarded to FURNITURE SELECTION

About FURNITURE SELECTION HOUSE

FURNITURE SELECTION HOUSE appears as a bidder on 5 government tenders on record, from 3 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 4 decided bids, it was awarded 2 — a 50.0% win rate — worth ₹25.9 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 22 Sept 2023.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is RSMML, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Rajasthan. On priced bids, its median quote is 12.5% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against AK JAIN AND ASSOCAITES, S. S. Enterprises and Samridhi Associates. AK JAIN AND ASSOCAITES bid on 4 of the same tenders and won 0 of them; FURNITURE SELECTION HOUSE won 2.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.