Competitor profile

AK JAIN AND ASSOCAITES

They win 18% of what they bid, but only 2% of the value — the bigger bids get away.

11tenders on record
6buyer authorities
1state
26 Oct 2023last award
Total bids
11
11 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
2
8 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹16.9 L
of ₹7.1 Cr bid — 2.4% conversion
Win rate
18.2%
of 11 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count11 bids
18.2%
72.7%
Awarded218.2%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected19.1%
Lost872.7%
By value₹7.1 Cr
89.9%
Awarded₹16.9 L2.4%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹55.0 L7.7%
Lost₹6.4 Cr89.9%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh
Rajasthan₹16.9 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
FURNITURE SELECTION HOUSE2 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹25.9 L
won head-to-head
02
Bhavya Construction Company2 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹17.9 L
won head-to-head
03
gupta fabricators0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
S. S. Enterprises0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
Samridhi Associates1 win · 3 shared tenders
₹53.0 L
won head-to-head
06
maruji traders0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedAK JAIN AND awardedOthers

About AK JAIN AND ASSOCAITES

AK JAIN AND ASSOCAITES appears as a bidder on 11 government tenders on record, from 6 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 11 decided bids, it was awarded 2 — a 18.2% win rate — worth ₹16.9 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 26 Oct 2023.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Mohan Lal Sukhadia University, Udaipur, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Rajasthan. On priced bids, its median quote is 13.7% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against FURNITURE SELECTION HOUSE, Bhavya Construction Company and gupta fabricators. FURNITURE SELECTION HOUSE bid on 4 of the same tenders and won 2 of them; AK JAIN AND ASSOCAITES won 0.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.