Competitor profile

En Kay Enterprises-En Kay Enterprises

They win 83% of what they bid — and >99.9% of the value, so the bids they miss are the smaller ones.

6tenders on record
4buyer authorities
1state
1 Jan 2015last award
Total bids
6
6 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
5
1 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹32.0 L
of ₹32.0 L bid — 100.0% conversion
Win rate
83.3%
of 6 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count6 bids
83.3%
16.7%
Awarded583.3%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost116.7%
By value₹32.0 L
100.0%
Awarded₹32.0 L100.0%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹3030.0%

Where they win

4 authorities · 1 state

Operating states

LowHigh
Delhi₹32.0 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
₹32.0 L
won head-to-head
02
Pawan Vij-Vij Sons2 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹20.1 L
won head-to-head
03
SNEH PERBHA GOEL-MS NITIN ENTERPRISES2 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹12.0 L
won head-to-head
04
H.S. Thakur0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
₹20.0 L
won head-to-head
06
Surinder Nath Jain-New India Press1 win · 2 shared tenders
₹20.0 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedEn Kay Enterprises-En awardedOthers

About En Kay Enterprises-En Kay Enterprises

En Kay Enterprises-En Kay Enterprises appears as a bidder on 6 government tenders on record, from 4 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 6 decided bids, it was awarded 5 — a 83.3% win rate — worth ₹32.0 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 1 Jan 2015.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Babu Jagjivan Ram Memorial Hospital, at 62.6% of what it has won, out of 4 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Delhi. On priced bids, its median quote is 17.2% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against Anil Kumar Sharma-Hygiene (India) Pvt. Ltd., Pawan Vij-Vij Sons and SNEH PERBHA GOEL-MS NITIN ENTERPRISES. Anil Kumar Sharma-Hygiene (India) Pvt. Ltd. bid on 4 of the same tenders and won 4 of them; En Kay Enterprises-En Kay Enterprises won 4.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.