Competitor profile

Ekvira Enterprises

They win 64% of what they bid, but only 39% of the value — the bigger bids get away.

11tenders on record
5buyer authorities
1state
11 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
11
11 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
7
1 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹98.2 L
of ₹2.5 Cr bid — 38.7% conversion
Win rate
63.6%
of 11 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count11 bids
63.6%
27.3%
Awarded763.6%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected327.3%
Lost19.1%
By value₹2.5 Cr
38.7%
60.5%
Awarded₹98.2 L38.7%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹1.5 Cr60.5%
Lost₹2.1 L0.8%

Where they win

2 authorities · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

RDD-CEO-NANDURBAR₹8.2 L8.3%

Operating states

LowHigh
Maharashtra₹98.2 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
M/s. M.M.PATIL0 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
02
ASHISH ENTERPRISES0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
SHUBHAM PADAMCHAND DAGA0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
J K Print1 win · 2 shared tenders
₹25.1 L
won head-to-head
05
Gaurav S Patil0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
NumenVentures (OPC) Pvt. Ltd.0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedEkvira Enterprises awardedOthers

About Ekvira Enterprises

Ekvira Enterprises appears as a bidder on 11 government tenders on record, from 5 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 11 decided bids, it was awarded 7 — a 63.6% win rate — worth ₹98.2 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 11 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Navi Mumbai Municipal Corporation, at 91.7% of what it has won, out of 2 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Maharashtra. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against M/s. M.M.PATIL, ASHISH ENTERPRISES and SHUBHAM PADAMCHAND DAGA. M/s. M.M.PATIL bid on 4 of the same tenders and won 0 of them; Ekvira Enterprises won 4.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.