Competitor profile

Docket Care Systems

They win 38% of what they bid — and 67% of the value, so the bids they miss are the smaller ones.

8tenders on record
3buyer authorities
0states
16 Feb 2026last award
Total bids
8
8 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
3
4 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹2.5 Cr
of ₹3.7 Cr bid — 67.5% conversion
Win rate
37.5%
of 8 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count8 bids
37.5%
12.5%
50.0%
Awarded337.5%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected112.5%
Lost450.0%
By value₹3.7 Cr
67.5%
28.6%
Awarded₹2.5 Cr67.5%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹14.5 L3.9%
Lost₹1.1 Cr28.6%

Where they win

2 authorities · 0 states

Operating states

LowHigh

3 awards on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
Strategic Marketing4 wins · 6 shared tenders
₹1.0 Cr
won head-to-head
02
₹0
won head-to-head
03
HUE SERVICE PVT. LTD.1 win · 2 shared tenders
₹14.7 L
won head-to-head
04
Intech Infosys0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
Acme Digitek Solutions (P) Ltd0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
Orbit Infosolutions0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedDocket Care awardedOthers

About Docket Care Systems

Docket Care Systems appears as a bidder on 8 government tenders on record, from 3 buyer authorities on central and PSU portals. Of its 8 decided bids, it was awarded 3 — a 37.5% win rate — worth ₹2.5 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 16 Feb 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is National Institute of Fashion Technology, at 76.4% of what it has won, out of 2 authorities that have awarded it work. On priced bids, its median quote is 0.3% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against Strategic Marketing, Finesse Information Systems Private Limited and HUE SERVICE PVT. LTD.. Strategic Marketing bid on 6 of the same tenders and won 4 of them; Docket Care Systems won 2.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.