Competitor profile

Design Forum International

They win 20% of what they bid, but only 5% of the value — the bigger bids get away.

5tenders on record
2buyer authorities
1state
1 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
5
5 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
1
4 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹7.2 L
of ₹1.4 Cr bid — 5.0% conversion
Win rate
20.0%
of 5 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count5 bids
20.0%
80.0%
Awarded120.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost480.0%
By value₹1.4 Cr
95.0%
Awarded₹7.2 L5.0%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹1.4 Cr95.0%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh
Punjab₹7.2 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
Arcop Associates Private Limited0 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
02
NMP Design Private Limited0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
The Urban Lab0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
Creative Footprints2 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹40.6 L
won head-to-head
05
Dhrupad Consultants Private Limited2 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹36.0 L
won head-to-head
06
Jana Urban Space Foundation (India)0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedDesign Forum awardedOthers

About Design Forum International

Design Forum International appears as a bidder on 5 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 5 decided bids, it was awarded 1 — a 20.0% win rate — worth ₹7.2 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 1 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Department of Local Government, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Punjab. On priced bids, its median quote is 66.9% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against Arcop Associates Private Limited, NMP Design Private Limited and The Urban Lab. Arcop Associates Private Limited bid on 4 of the same tenders and won 0 of them; Design Forum International won 0.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.