Competitor profile

CLASSIC JK SUPPLIERS

They win 31% of what they bid, and 31% of the value they chase.

50tenders on record
1buyer authority
0states
29 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
48
50 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
15
30 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹1.6 Cr
of ₹5.1 Cr bid — 31.4% conversion
Win rate
31.3%
of 48 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count48 bids
31.3%
62.5%
Awarded1531.3%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected36.3%
Lost3062.5%
By value₹5.1 Cr
31.4%
64.3%
Awarded₹1.6 Cr31.4%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹22.3 L4.3%
Lost₹3.3 Cr64.3%

Where they win

1 authority · 0 states

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

15 awards on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
₹23.3 L
won head-to-head
02
M/S A Q ENTERPRISES5 wins · 24 shared tenders
₹40.2 L
won head-to-head
03
M/S SHIMAR STAR GLACIER5 wins · 23 shared tenders
₹34.0 L
won head-to-head
04
JK BUILDERS AND ENGINEERS3 wins · 20 shared tenders
₹22.9 L
won head-to-head
05
M/S RATHER STEEL WORKS5 wins · 19 shared tenders
₹33.7 L
won head-to-head
06
M/S SHEIKH FEROOZ AHMAD3 wins · 15 shared tenders
₹22.2 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedCLASSIC JK awardedOthers

About CLASSIC JK SUPPLIERS

CLASSIC JK SUPPLIERS appears as a bidder on 50 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority on central and PSU portals. Of its 48 decided bids, it was awarded 15 — a 31.3% win rate — worth ₹1.6 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 29 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is E-IN-C BRANCH - MILITARY ENGINEER SERVICES, at 100.0% of what it has won. On priced bids, its median quote is 9.5% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against M/s FAYAZ AHMAD BHAT C/O ZAHOOR AHMAD DAR, M/S A Q ENTERPRISES and M/S SHIMAR STAR GLACIER. M/s FAYAZ AHMAD BHAT C/O ZAHOOR AHMAD DAR bid on 24 of the same tenders and won 3 of them; CLASSIC JK SUPPLIERS won 8.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.