Competitor profile

M/S A Q ENTERPRISES

They win 23% of what they bid, and 18% of the value they chase.

73tenders on record
1buyer authority
0states
29 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
69
73 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
16
53 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹1.3 Cr
of ₹6.9 Cr bid — 18.2% conversion
Win rate
23.2%
of 69 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count69 bids
23.2%
76.8%
Awarded1623.2%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost5376.8%
By value₹6.9 Cr
18.2%
81.8%
Awarded₹1.3 Cr18.2%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹5.6 Cr81.8%

Where they win

1 authority · 0 states

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

16 awards on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
₹12.7 L
won head-to-head
02
M/S RATHER STEEL WORKS5 wins · 29 shared tenders
₹25.7 L
won head-to-head
03
M/S SHIMAR STAR GLACIER5 wins · 25 shared tenders
₹28.8 L
won head-to-head
04
CLASSIC JK SUPPLIERS9 wins · 24 shared tenders
₹63.0 L
won head-to-head
05
JK BUILDERS AND ENGINEERS5 wins · 20 shared tenders
₹29.5 L
won head-to-head
06
M/S SHEIKH FEROOZ AHMAD2 wins · 17 shared tenders
₹11.1 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedA Q ENTERPRISES awardedOthers

About M/S A Q ENTERPRISES

M/S A Q ENTERPRISES appears as a bidder on 73 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority on central and PSU portals. Of its 69 decided bids, it was awarded 16 — a 23.2% win rate — worth ₹1.3 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 29 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is E-IN-C BRANCH - MILITARY ENGINEER SERVICES, at 100.0% of what it has won. On priced bids, its median quote is 11.9% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against M/s FAYAZ AHMAD BHAT C/O ZAHOOR AHMAD DAR, M/S RATHER STEEL WORKS and M/S SHIMAR STAR GLACIER. M/s FAYAZ AHMAD BHAT C/O ZAHOOR AHMAD DAR bid on 35 of the same tenders and won 2 of them; M/S A Q ENTERPRISES won 6.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.