Competitor profile

CHIRON INSTRUMENTS I PVT LTD

They win 50% of what they bid, but only 1% of the value — the bigger bids get away.

2tenders on record
2buyer authorities
1state
30 Jun 2026last award
Total bids
2
2 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
1
0 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹1.1 L
of ₹80.2 L bid — 1.3% conversion
Win rate
50.0%
of 2 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count2 bids
50.0%
50.0%
Awarded150.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected150.0%
Lost00.0%
By value₹80.2 L
98.7%
Awarded₹1.1 L1.3%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹79.1 L98.7%
Lost₹00.0%

Where they win

1 authority · 0 states

Top buyer organisations

Delhi University₹1.1 L100.0%

Operating states

LowHigh

1 award on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
Gunjan Surgical and Scientific Co.0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
02
Metro Medicos0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
03
AUSTIN HEALTH CARE1 win · 1 shared tender
₹79.1 L
won head-to-head
04
Med Xpress Pharma India LLP0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
05
Royal Enterprises0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
06
Sheetal Pharma and Lifecare0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedCHIRON INSTRUMENTS awardedOthers

Recent tenders awarded to CHIRON INSTRUMENTS

About CHIRON INSTRUMENTS I PVT LTD

CHIRON INSTRUMENTS I PVT LTD appears as a bidder on 2 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 2 decided bids, it was awarded 1 — a 50.0% win rate — worth ₹1.1 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 30 Jun 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Delhi University, at 100.0% of what it has won. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against Gunjan Surgical and Scientific Co., Metro Medicos and AUSTIN HEALTH CARE. Gunjan Surgical and Scientific Co. bid on 1 of the same tender and won 0 of them; CHIRON INSTRUMENTS I PVT LTD won 0.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.