Competitor profile

CHAUGULE RAVI DHARMANNA

They win 13% of what they bid, and 4% of the value they chase.

8tenders on record
2buyer authorities
1state
2 Oct 2026last award
Total bids
8
8 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
1
7 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹3.3 L
of ₹78.2 L bid — 4.3% conversion
Win rate
12.5%
of 8 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count8 bids
12.5%
87.5%
Awarded112.5%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost787.5%
By value₹78.2 L
95.7%
Awarded₹3.3 L4.3%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹74.9 L95.7%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh
Maharashtra₹3.3 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
Ajit Anantrao Vyavahare2 wins · 5 shared tenders
₹4.9 L
won head-to-head
02
PAPARIKAR NIKHIL NITIN0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
Abhaysinh Murlidhar Dattu1 win · 3 shared tenders
₹8.2 L
won head-to-head
04
M/S Anna Bharat Metkari1 win · 3 shared tenders
₹5.6 L
won head-to-head
05
₹6.9 L
won head-to-head
06
M/S DINESH RATILAL LUGADE0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedCHAUGULE RAVI awardedOthers

About CHAUGULE RAVI DHARMANNA

CHAUGULE RAVI DHARMANNA appears as a bidder on 8 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 8 decided bids, it was awarded 1 — a 12.5% win rate — worth ₹3.3 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 2 Oct 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Directorate Of Municipal Administration, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Maharashtra. On priced bids, its median quote is 13.3% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against Ajit Anantrao Vyavahare, PAPARIKAR NIKHIL NITIN and Abhaysinh Murlidhar Dattu. Ajit Anantrao Vyavahare bid on 5 of the same tenders and won 2 of them; CHAUGULE RAVI DHARMANNA won 0.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.