Competitor profile

ch.jagdamba m.v.m.s.s ltd hippergamal

They win 20% of what they bid, and 30% of the value they chase.

5tenders on record
2buyer authorities
1state
8 Jul 2026last award
Total bids
5
5 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
1
0 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹38.2 L
of ₹1.3 Cr bid — 29.8% conversion
Win rate
20.0%
of 5 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count5 bids
20.0%
80.0%
Awarded120.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected480.0%
Lost00.0%
By value₹1.3 Cr
29.8%
70.2%
Awarded₹38.2 L29.8%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹89.8 L70.2%
Lost₹00.0%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh
Maharashtra₹38.2 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
GIRIDHAR DIGAMBAR DAKORE PATIL0 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
02
ATULKUMAR BHAURAO NAIK1 win · 4 shared tenders
₹12.2 L
won head-to-head
03
Balaji Narayanrao pakande3 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹55.8 L
won head-to-head
04
SHRI SAI CONSTRUCTION0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
CHANDRAKANT BHAGWANRAO CHINCHALKAR0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
06
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedch.jagdamba awardedOthers

About ch.jagdamba m.v.m.s.s ltd hippergamal

ch.jagdamba m.v.m.s.s ltd hippergamal appears as a bidder on 5 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 5 decided bids, it was awarded 1 — a 20.0% win rate — worth ₹38.2 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 8 Jul 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is CE Water Resources Department Aurangabad, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Maharashtra. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against GIRIDHAR DIGAMBAR DAKORE PATIL, ATULKUMAR BHAURAO NAIK and Balaji Narayanrao pakande. GIRIDHAR DIGAMBAR DAKORE PATIL bid on 4 of the same tenders and won 0 of them; ch.jagdamba m.v.m.s.s ltd hippergamal won 0.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.