Competitor profile

Burman Et.Al

They win 29% of what they bid, but only 15% of the value — the bigger bids get away.

7tenders on record
1buyer authority
0states
18 Jan 2021last award
Total bids
7
7 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
2
0 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹4.6 L
of ₹31.7 L bid — 14.6% conversion
Win rate
28.6%
of 7 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count7 bids
28.6%
71.4%
Awarded228.6%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected571.4%
Lost00.0%
By value₹31.7 L
14.6%
85.4%
Awarded₹4.6 L14.6%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹27.1 L85.4%
Lost₹00.0%

Where they win

1 authority · 0 states

Top buyer organisations

IndianOil₹4.6 L100.0%

Operating states

LowHigh

2 awards on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
City Development Corporation0 wins · 7 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
02
Creative Forum Pvt. Ltd.0 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
ARCHITECT YETINDER MATHUR2 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹14.3 L
won head-to-head
04
₹0
won head-to-head
05
Cortex Construction Solutions Pvt. Ltd.0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
DEARCH ENGINEERS PVT LTD0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedBurman Et.Al awardedOthers

About Burman Et.Al

Burman Et.Al appears as a bidder on 7 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority on central and PSU portals. Of its 7 decided bids, it was awarded 2 — a 28.6% win rate — worth ₹4.6 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 18 Jan 2021.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is IndianOil, at 100.0% of what it has won. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against City Development Corporation, Creative Forum Pvt. Ltd. and ARCHITECT YETINDER MATHUR. City Development Corporation bid on 7 of the same tenders and won 0 of them; Burman Et.Al won 2.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.