Competitor profile

M/s Brar Electrical & Suppliers

They win 17% of what they bid, and 23% of the value they chase.

6tenders on record
4buyer authorities
1state
21 Aug 2026last award
Total bids
6
6 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
1
5 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹14.8 L
of ₹63.9 L bid — 23.2% conversion
Win rate
16.7%
of 6 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count6 bids
16.7%
83.3%
Awarded116.7%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost583.3%
By value₹63.9 L
23.2%
76.8%
Awarded₹14.8 L23.2%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹49.1 L76.8%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh
Punjab₹14.8 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
₹0
won head-to-head
02
H.S. GHUMAN AND COMPANY2 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹16.2 L
won head-to-head
03
GURNAM SINGH1 win · 1 shared tender
₹10
won head-to-head
04
JAGDISH KUMAR0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
05
GIAN SINGH1 win · 1 shared tender
₹10
won head-to-head
06
HARDEEP SINGH0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedBrar Electrical awardedOthers

About M/s Brar Electrical & Suppliers

M/s Brar Electrical & Suppliers appears as a bidder on 6 government tenders on record, from 4 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 6 decided bids, it was awarded 1 — a 16.7% win rate — worth ₹14.8 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 21 Aug 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Department of Medical Education and Research, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Punjab. On priced bids, its median quote is 5.6% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against MAPPLE MANAGEMENT SERVICES PRICATE LIMITED, H.S. GHUMAN AND COMPANY and GURNAM SINGH. MAPPLE MANAGEMENT SERVICES PRICATE LIMITED bid on 2 of the same tenders and won 0 of them; M/s Brar Electrical & Suppliers won 0.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.