Competitor profile

Baiju t a

They win 51% of what they bid, and 48% of the value they chase.

77tenders on record
2buyer authorities
1state
1 Apr 2026last award
Total bids
77
77 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
39
37 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹7.0 Cr
of ₹14.7 Cr bid — 47.8% conversion
Win rate
50.6%
of 77 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count77 bids
50.6%
48.1%
Awarded3950.6%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected11.3%
Lost3748.1%
By value₹14.7 Cr
47.8%
51.8%
Awarded₹7.0 Cr47.8%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹6.1 L0.4%
Lost₹7.6 Cr51.8%

Where they win

2 authorities · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh
Puducherry₹7.0 Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
GIRIJA P4 wins · 20 shared tenders
₹78.9 L
won head-to-head
02
RAMESH TP6 wins · 19 shared tenders
₹1.1 Cr
won head-to-head
03
N. RAJENDRAN6 wins · 12 shared tenders
₹56.6 L
won head-to-head
04
SHINOJ2 wins · 11 shared tenders
₹36.0 L
won head-to-head
05
Suresh Babu CT7 wins · 10 shared tenders
₹96.8 L
won head-to-head
06
SALEEM O.K2 wins · 9 shared tenders
₹51.1 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedBaiju t a awardedOthers

About Baiju t a

Baiju t a appears as a bidder on 77 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 77 decided bids, it was awarded 39 — a 50.6% win rate — worth ₹7.0 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 1 Apr 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Department of Local Administration, at 58.3% of what it has won, out of 2 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Puducherry. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against GIRIJA P, RAMESH TP and N. RAJENDRAN. GIRIJA P bid on 20 of the same tenders and won 4 of them; Baiju t a won 11.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.