Competitor profile

Atul Navle

They win 40% of what they bid, and 43% of the value they chase.

35tenders on record
3buyer authorities
1state
19 Aug 2026last award
Total bids
35
35 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
14
21 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹1.5 Cr
of ₹3.5 Cr bid — 43.0% conversion
Win rate
40.0%
of 35 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count35 bids
40.0%
60.0%
Awarded1440.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost2160.0%
By value₹3.5 Cr
43.0%
57.0%
Awarded₹1.5 Cr43.0%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹2.0 Cr57.0%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh
Goa₹1.5 Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
M/s Nandana Kishore Constructions LLP6 wins · 10 shared tenders
₹52.0 L
won head-to-head
02
NOON CONSTRUCTION0 wins · 8 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
PAI.COM CONSTRUCTION0 wins · 7 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
SABEEB CONSTRUCTION1 win · 3 shared tenders
₹4.1 L
won head-to-head
05
Kishor Naik2 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹21.3 L
won head-to-head
06
M/S S R Construction1 win · 3 shared tenders
₹5.3 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedAtul Navle awardedOthers

About Atul Navle

Atul Navle appears as a bidder on 35 government tenders on record, from 3 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 35 decided bids, it was awarded 14 — a 40.0% win rate — worth ₹1.5 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 19 Aug 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Goa. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against M/s Nandana Kishore Constructions LLP, NOON CONSTRUCTION and PAI.COM CONSTRUCTION. M/s Nandana Kishore Constructions LLP bid on 10 of the same tenders and won 6 of them; Atul Navle won 0.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.