Competitor profile

ATUL DILIP BHAVSAR

They win 36% of what they bid, and 36% of the value they chase.

11tenders on record
2buyer authorities
1state
22 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
11
11 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
4
6 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹97.9 L
of ₹2.7 Cr bid — 35.6% conversion
Win rate
36.4%
of 11 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count11 bids
36.4%
54.5%
Awarded436.4%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected19.1%
Lost654.5%
By value₹2.7 Cr
35.6%
10.9%
53.5%
Awarded₹97.9 L35.6%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹30.0 L10.9%
Lost₹1.5 Cr53.5%

Where they win

2 authorities · 1 state

Operating states

LowHigh
Maharashtra₹97.9 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
RAMESH SURAJMAL DHADIWAL1 win · 3 shared tenders
₹30.0 L
won head-to-head
02
SHRI. S. R. SONAJE1 win · 3 shared tenders
₹17.1 L
won head-to-head
03
NITIN D HINDURAO0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
M/s MetaBuild Constructions1 win · 2 shared tenders
₹9.9 L
won head-to-head
05
K G Dube & Sons1 win · 2 shared tenders
₹9.9 L
won head-to-head
06
VALMIK JANARDHAN PATHADE1 win · 2 shared tenders
₹41.7 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedATUL DILIP awardedOthers

About ATUL DILIP BHAVSAR

ATUL DILIP BHAVSAR appears as a bidder on 11 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 11 decided bids, it was awarded 4 — a 36.4% win rate — worth ₹97.9 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 22 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is CE (WRD) North Maharashtra Region Nashik, at 54.3% of what it has won, out of 2 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Maharashtra. On priced bids, its median quote is 0.6% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against RAMESH SURAJMAL DHADIWAL, SHRI. S. R. SONAJE and NITIN D HINDURAO. RAMESH SURAJMAL DHADIWAL bid on 3 of the same tenders and won 1 of them; ATUL DILIP BHAVSAR won 1.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.