Competitor profile

ATHARV FACILITY SERVICES

They win 50% of what they bid, but only 3% of the value — the bigger bids get away.

6tenders on record
3buyer authorities
1state
24 Aug 2026last award
Total bids
6
6 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
3
0 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹24.0 L
of ₹6.9 Cr bid — 3.5% conversion
Win rate
50.0%
of 6 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count6 bids
50.0%
50.0%
Awarded350.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected350.0%
Lost00.0%
By value₹6.9 Cr
96.5%
Awarded₹24.0 L3.5%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹6.7 Cr96.5%
Lost₹00.0%

Where they win

2 authorities · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh
Maharashtra₹24.0 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
Safe Taker Security Force1 win · 2 shared tenders
₹2.0 L
won head-to-head
02
Kalpataru0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
We Alliance Facility Management LLP0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
jha p and compony0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
Kulswamini Enterprises0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedATHARV FACILITY awardedOthers

About ATHARV FACILITY SERVICES

ATHARV FACILITY SERVICES appears as a bidder on 6 government tenders on record, from 3 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 6 decided bids, it was awarded 3 — a 50.0% win rate — worth ₹24.0 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 24 Aug 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Ulhasnagar Municipal Corporation, at 97.1% of what it has won, out of 2 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Maharashtra. On priced bids, its median quote is 0.3% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against Safe Taker Security Force, Kalpataru and We Alliance Facility Management LLP. Safe Taker Security Force bid on 2 of the same tenders and won 1 of them; ATHARV FACILITY SERVICES won 1.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.