Competitor profile

M/S ARNAV CONSTRUCTION

They win 17% of what they bid, and 10% of the value they chase.

23tenders on record
6buyer authorities
1state
1 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
23
23 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
4
13 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹1.6 Cr
of ₹16.3 Cr bid — 9.6% conversion
Win rate
17.4%
of 23 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count23 bids
17.4%
26.1%
56.5%
Awarded417.4%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected626.1%
Lost1356.5%
By value₹16.3 Cr
26.1%
64.3%
Awarded₹1.6 Cr9.6%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹4.3 Cr26.1%
Lost₹10.5 Cr64.3%

Where they win

2 authorities · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

RDD-CEO-LATUR₹1.3 Cr81.9%

Operating states

LowHigh
Maharashtra₹1.6 Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
paras construction2 wins · 8 shared tenders
₹4.4 Cr
won head-to-head
02
Manoj Balaji More0 wins · 6 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
Tanaji Ramrao Patil0 wins · 6 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
Ajinkya Constructions, Latur0 wins · 6 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
M/S ISHWARI CONSTRUCTION5 wins · 6 shared tenders
₹5.2 Cr
won head-to-head
06
Amol Madhukar Kalme0 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedARNAV CONSTRUCTION awardedOthers

About M/S ARNAV CONSTRUCTION

M/S ARNAV CONSTRUCTION appears as a bidder on 23 government tenders on record, from 6 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 23 decided bids, it was awarded 4 — a 17.4% win rate — worth ₹1.6 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 1 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is RDD-CEO-LATUR, at 81.9% of what it has won, out of 2 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Maharashtra. On priced bids, its median quote is 1.0% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against paras construction, Manoj Balaji More and Tanaji Ramrao Patil. paras construction bid on 8 of the same tenders and won 2 of them; M/S ARNAV CONSTRUCTION won 1.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.