Competitor profile

ARIJIT GUHA

They win 50% of what they bid, and 54% of the value they chase.

2tenders on record
2buyer authorities
1state
29 Aug 2026last award
Total bids
2
2 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
1
1 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹4.5 L
of ₹8.4 L bid — 53.8% conversion
Win rate
50.0%
of 2 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count2 bids
50.0%
50.0%
Awarded150.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost150.0%
By value₹8.4 L
53.8%
46.2%
Awarded₹4.5 L53.8%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹3.9 L46.2%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh
West Bengal₹4.5 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
SUBHASISH MONDAL0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
02
MAA TARA CONSTRUCTION1 win · 1 shared tender
₹3.9 L
won head-to-head
03
NITYANANDA RANA0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
04
SUBHAJIT BANERJEE0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
05
gon associates0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
06
DEBASIS PATRA0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedARIJIT GUHA awardedOthers

Recent tenders awarded to ARIJIT GUHA

About ARIJIT GUHA

ARIJIT GUHA appears as a bidder on 2 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 2 decided bids, it was awarded 1 — a 50.0% win rate — worth ₹4.5 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 29 Aug 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is MUNICIPAL AFFAIRS DEPARTMENT, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from West Bengal. On priced bids, its median quote is 0.6% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against SUBHASISH MONDAL, MAA TARA CONSTRUCTION and NITYANANDA RANA. SUBHASISH MONDAL bid on 1 of the same tender and won 0 of them; ARIJIT GUHA won 0.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.