Competitor profile

AQUEEL AHMED ABDUL KHALIQUE

They won all 5 of their bids with a result, worth ₹3.1 Cr.

5tenders on record
1buyer authority
1state
24 Jul 2026last award
Total bids
5
5 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
5
0 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹3.1 Cr
of ₹3.1 Cr bid — 100.0% conversion
Win rate
100.0%
of 5 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count5 bids
100.0%
Awarded5100.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost00.0%
By value₹3.1 Cr
100.0%
Awarded₹3.1 Cr100.0%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹00.0%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh
Maharashtra₹3.1 Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
SUDHIR TUKARAM JADHAV0 wins · 5 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
02
MRUNAL CONSTRUCTION0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
SAYYAD EJAZUDDIN SAYYAD NIZAMUDDIN0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
PIYUSH MADHUKAR PAWAR0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
05
M/S RAJLAXMI CONSTRUCTION0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedAQUEEL AHMED awardedOthers

About AQUEEL AHMED ABDUL KHALIQUE

AQUEEL AHMED ABDUL KHALIQUE appears as a bidder on 5 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority in 1 state. Of its 5 decided bids, it was awarded 5 — a 100.0% win rate — worth ₹3.1 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 24 Jul 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Malegaon Municipal Corporation Malegaon, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Maharashtra. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against SUDHIR TUKARAM JADHAV, MRUNAL CONSTRUCTION and SAYYAD EJAZUDDIN SAYYAD NIZAMUDDIN. SUDHIR TUKARAM JADHAV bid on 5 of the same tenders and won 0 of them; AQUEEL AHMED ABDUL KHALIQUE won 5.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.