Competitor profile

Anup Kumar Agarwala

They win 46% of what they bid, but only 22% of the value — the bigger bids get away.

13tenders on record
4buyer authorities
1state
29 Nov 2024last award
Total bids
13
13 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
6
5 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹4.3 Cr
of ₹19.4 Cr bid — 22.4% conversion
Win rate
46.1%
of 13 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count13 bids
46.2%
15.4%
38.5%
Awarded646.2%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected215.4%
Lost538.5%
By value₹19.4 Cr
22.4%
61.8%
15.9%
Awarded₹4.3 Cr22.4%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹12.0 Cr61.8%
Lost₹3.1 Cr15.9%

Where they win

3 authorities · 1 state

Operating states

LowHigh
Assam₹4.3 Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
Khitish Ojha1 win · 4 shared tenders
₹1
won head-to-head
02
MS L N Distributors2 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹89.3 L
won head-to-head
03
Shoiab Khan3 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹3
won head-to-head
04
r r enterprise3 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹3
won head-to-head
05
Power Tools and Engineering2 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹2
won head-to-head
06
Dochania and Company Private Limited3 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹3
won head-to-head
Rival awardedAnup Kumar awardedOthers

About Anup Kumar Agarwala

Anup Kumar Agarwala appears as a bidder on 13 government tenders on record, from 4 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 13 decided bids, it was awarded 6 — a 46.1% win rate — worth ₹4.3 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 29 Nov 2024.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Irrigation Department, at 76.0% of what it has won, out of 3 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Assam. On priced bids, its median quote is 0.0% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against Khitish Ojha, MS L N Distributors and Shoiab Khan. Khitish Ojha bid on 4 of the same tenders and won 1 of them; Anup Kumar Agarwala won 3.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.