Competitor profile

ANIL KUMAR CONTRACTOR

They win 39% of what they bid, and 35% of the value they chase.

57tenders on record
8buyer authorities
1state
7 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
57
57 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
22
32 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹91.1 Cr
of ₹260.9 Cr bid — 34.9% conversion
Win rate
38.6%
of 57 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count57 bids
38.6%
56.1%
Awarded2238.6%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected35.3%
Lost3256.1%
By value₹260.9 Cr
34.9%
62.0%
Awarded₹91.1 Cr34.9%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹8.2 Cr3.1%
Lost₹161.7 Cr62.0%

Where they win

5 authorities · 1 state

Operating states

LowHigh
Punjab₹91.1 Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
MS PARKASH CHAND GOYAL1 win · 10 shared tenders
₹1.2 Cr
won head-to-head
02
FLORID PRINT AND PACK PRIVATE LIMITED0 wins · 8 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
RAJESH MEHTA CONTRACTOR1 win · 6 shared tenders
₹40.2 L
won head-to-head
04
JASPAL ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR2 wins · 6 shared tenders
₹25.5 L
won head-to-head
05
SANWARIYA SETH0 wins · 5 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
SARBJIT SINGH CONTRACTOR0 wins · 5 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedANIL KUMAR awardedOthers

About ANIL KUMAR CONTRACTOR

ANIL KUMAR CONTRACTOR appears as a bidder on 57 government tenders on record, from 8 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 57 decided bids, it was awarded 22 — a 38.6% win rate — worth ₹91.1 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 7 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is CE-PWD(B and R), at 79.2% of what it has won, out of 5 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Punjab. On priced bids, its median quote is 1.0% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against MS PARKASH CHAND GOYAL, FLORID PRINT AND PACK PRIVATE LIMITED and RAJESH MEHTA CONTRACTOR. MS PARKASH CHAND GOYAL bid on 10 of the same tenders and won 1 of them; ANIL KUMAR CONTRACTOR won 4.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.