Competitor profile

M/S ANANYA CONSTRUCTION

They win 17% of what they bid, and 18% of the value they chase.

8tenders on record
2buyer authorities
1state
21 Aug 2026last award
Total bids
6
8 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
1
4 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹52.7 L
of ₹3.0 Cr bid — 17.5% conversion
Win rate
16.7%
of 6 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count6 bids
16.7%
16.7%
66.7%
Awarded116.7%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected116.7%
Lost466.7%
By value₹3.0 Cr
17.5%
12.4%
70.1%
Awarded₹52.7 L17.5%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹37.4 L12.4%
Lost₹2.1 Cr70.1%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Zila Parishad Deoghar₹52.7 L100.0%

Operating states

LowHigh
Jharkhand₹52.7 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
M/S KISHOR KUMAR THAKUR0 wins · 5 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
02
TRILOCHAN MAHTO1 win · 3 shared tenders
₹50.1 L
won head-to-head
03
PRAMOD KUMAR0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
ANIKET INFRATECH PRIVATE LIMITED0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
Mukesh Kumar Singh0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
KARU MAHTO0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedANANYA CONSTRUCTION awardedOthers

Recent tenders awarded to ANANYA CONSTRUCTION

About M/S ANANYA CONSTRUCTION

M/S ANANYA CONSTRUCTION appears as a bidder on 8 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 6 decided bids, it was awarded 1 — a 16.7% win rate — worth ₹52.7 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 21 Aug 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Zila Parishad Deoghar, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Jharkhand. On priced bids, its median quote is 2.7% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against M/S KISHOR KUMAR THAKUR, TRILOCHAN MAHTO and PRAMOD KUMAR. M/S KISHOR KUMAR THAKUR bid on 5 of the same tenders and won 0 of them; M/S ANANYA CONSTRUCTION won 1.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.