Competitor profile

KARU MAHTO

They win 39% of what they bid — and 52% of the value, so the bids they miss are the smaller ones.

20tenders on record
2buyer authorities
1state
9 May 2026last award
Total bids
18
20 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
7
5 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹3.9 Cr
of ₹7.5 Cr bid — 52.4% conversion
Win rate
38.9%
of 18 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count18 bids
38.9%
33.3%
27.8%
Awarded738.9%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected633.3%
Lost527.8%
By value₹7.5 Cr
52.4%
31.5%
16.0%
Awarded₹3.9 Cr52.4%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹2.4 Cr31.5%
Lost₹1.2 Cr16.0%

Where they win

2 authorities · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

RWD EinC₹3.0 Cr75.4%
Zila Parishad Deoghar₹96.4 L24.6%

Operating states

LowHigh
Jharkhand₹3.9 Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
PRATAP KUMAR3 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹68.1 L
won head-to-head
02
AMIT KUMAR CHOUDHARY3 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹73.8 L
won head-to-head
03
TRILOCHAN MAHTO2 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹29.2 L
won head-to-head
04
JAIPRAKASH SINGH3 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹55.0 L
won head-to-head
05
RAJEEV RANJAN KUMAR2 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹65.3 L
won head-to-head
06
INDU DEVI2 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹54.9 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedKARU MAHTO awardedOthers

Recent tenders awarded to KARU MAHTO

About KARU MAHTO

KARU MAHTO appears as a bidder on 20 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 18 decided bids, it was awarded 7 — a 38.9% win rate — worth ₹3.9 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 9 May 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is RWD EinC, at 75.4% of what it has won, out of 2 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Jharkhand. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against PRATAP KUMAR, AMIT KUMAR CHOUDHARY and TRILOCHAN MAHTO. PRATAP KUMAR bid on 4 of the same tenders and won 3 of them; KARU MAHTO won 0.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.