Competitor profile

ANA KAINAT MOHAMMAD NASEEM

They win 8% of what they bid, and 4% of the value they chase.

13tenders on record
4buyer authorities
1state
23 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
12
13 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
1
8 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹9.5 L
of ₹2.6 Cr bid — 3.7% conversion
Win rate
8.3%
of 12 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count12 bids
25.0%
66.7%
Awarded18.3%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected325.0%
Lost866.7%
By value₹2.6 Cr
51.4%
44.9%
Awarded₹9.5 L3.7%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹1.3 Cr51.4%
Lost₹1.2 Cr44.9%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh
Maharashtra₹9.5 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
Ravindra Tukaram Gaikwad0 wins · 6 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
02
SHARADDCHANDRA RAMESH JAISWAL0 wins · 6 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
AKHILESH S. AGHADTE0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
GORAKHNATH NARSING RATHOD0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
SUMIT DNYANESHWAR UDAKHE0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
R.S.Ugale0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedANA KAINAT awardedOthers

About ANA KAINAT MOHAMMAD NASEEM

ANA KAINAT MOHAMMAD NASEEM appears as a bidder on 13 government tenders on record, from 4 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 12 decided bids, it was awarded 1 — a 8.3% win rate — worth ₹9.5 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 23 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is CE(SP)-Water Resources Dept. Amravati, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Maharashtra. On priced bids, its median quote is 8.7% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against Ravindra Tukaram Gaikwad, SHARADDCHANDRA RAMESH JAISWAL and AKHILESH S. AGHADTE. Ravindra Tukaram Gaikwad bid on 6 of the same tenders and won 0 of them; ANA KAINAT MOHAMMAD NASEEM won 0.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.