Competitor profile

M/S AMIT TRADERS

They win 22% of what they bid — and 66% of the value, so the bids they miss are the smaller ones.

56tenders on record
4buyer authorities
1state
8 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
54
56 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
12
32 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹22.3 Cr
of ₹33.7 Cr bid — 66.1% conversion
Win rate
22.2%
of 54 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count54 bids
22.2%
18.5%
59.3%
Awarded1222.2%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected1018.5%
Lost3259.3%
By value₹33.7 Cr
66.1%
24.4%
Awarded₹22.3 Cr66.1%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹3.2 Cr9.5%
Lost₹8.2 Cr24.4%

Where they win

3 authorities · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh
Uttar Pradesh₹22.3 Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
M/s Ipshita Construction17 wins · 33 shared tenders
₹4.8 Cr
won head-to-head
02
SINGH CONSTRUCTION5 wins · 19 shared tenders
₹1.3 Cr
won head-to-head
03
ASTITVA CONSTRUCTION5 wins · 9 shared tenders
₹62.9 L
won head-to-head
04
M/s shikar contractor and supplyer0 wins · 8 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
K K INFRA HOMES PRIVATE LIMITED6 wins · 6 shared tenders
₹75.4 L
won head-to-head
06
M/S ASHA SINGH CONTRACTOR0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedAMIT TRADERS awardedOthers

About M/S AMIT TRADERS

M/S AMIT TRADERS appears as a bidder on 56 government tenders on record, from 4 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 54 decided bids, it was awarded 12 — a 22.2% win rate — worth ₹22.3 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 8 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is U.P. Projects Corporation Ltd., at 91.9% of what it has won, out of 3 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Uttar Pradesh. On priced bids, its median quote is 0.1% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against M/s Ipshita Construction, SINGH CONSTRUCTION and ASTITVA CONSTRUCTION. M/s Ipshita Construction bid on 33 of the same tenders and won 17 of them; M/S AMIT TRADERS won 3.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.