Competitor profile

M/S AMIT ENTERPRISES

They win 50% of what they bid — and 88% of the value, so the bids they miss are the smaller ones.

8tenders on record
2buyer authorities
1state
13 Dec 2023last award
Total bids
8
8 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
4
4 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹1.0K Cr
of ₹1.1K Cr bid — 88.3% conversion
Win rate
50.0%
of 8 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count8 bids
50.0%
50.0%
Awarded450.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost450.0%
By value₹1.1K Cr
88.3%
11.7%
Awarded₹1.0K Cr88.3%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹133.2 Cr11.7%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

RCDF- MD₹1.0K Cr100.0%

Operating states

LowHigh
Rajasthan₹1.0K Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
CHUGH ENTERPRISES5 wins · 7 shared tenders
₹1.0K Cr
won head-to-head
02
Shivani Trading Company5 wins · 6 shared tenders
₹3.6 Cr
won head-to-head
03
SUBHASH R KARWA6 wins · 6 shared tenders
₹55.6 Cr
won head-to-head
04
M/s SURBHI AGRO5 wins · 6 shared tenders
₹4.4 Cr
won head-to-head
05
M/S SAKHI6 wins · 6 shared tenders
₹37.7 Cr
won head-to-head
06
JAI DURGA ENTERPRISES2 wins · 6 shared tenders
₹1.3 Cr
won head-to-head
Rival awardedAMIT ENTERPRISES awardedOthers

About M/S AMIT ENTERPRISES

M/S AMIT ENTERPRISES appears as a bidder on 8 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 8 decided bids, it was awarded 4 — a 50.0% win rate — worth ₹1.0K Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 13 Dec 2023.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is RCDF- MD, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Rajasthan. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against CHUGH ENTERPRISES, Shivani Trading Company and SUBHASH R KARWA. CHUGH ENTERPRISES bid on 7 of the same tenders and won 5 of them; M/S AMIT ENTERPRISES won 4.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.