Competitor profile

M/s SURBHI AGRO

They win 63% of what they bid, and 57% of the value they chase.

194tenders on record
2buyer authorities
1state
12 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
194
194 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
123
58 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹1.2K Cr
of ₹2.1K Cr bid — 56.8% conversion
Win rate
63.4%
of 194 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count194 bids
63.4%
29.9%
Awarded12363.4%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected136.7%
Lost5829.9%
By value₹2.1K Cr
56.8%
39.0%
Awarded₹1.2K Cr56.8%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹87.6 Cr4.2%
Lost₹815.6 Cr39.0%

Where they win

2 authorities · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

RCDF- MD₹1.2K Cr99.4%

Operating states

LowHigh
Rajasthan₹1.2K Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
M/S SAKHI144 wins · 155 shared tenders
₹1.6K Cr
won head-to-head
02
BABU LAL MOTI LAL85 wins · 133 shared tenders
₹195.3 Cr
won head-to-head
03
SUBHASH R KARWA109 wins · 131 shared tenders
₹1.7K Cr
won head-to-head
04
SHREE NATH INDUSTRIES109 wins · 127 shared tenders
₹1.4K Cr
won head-to-head
05
Shiva Protein Products Pvt Ltd Unit-II61 wins · 126 shared tenders
₹1.2K Cr
won head-to-head
06
M/S Sanjay Tading Corporation104 wins · 123 shared tenders
₹1.3K Cr
won head-to-head
Rival awardedSURBHI AGRO awardedOthers

Recent tenders awarded to SURBHI AGRO

About M/s SURBHI AGRO

M/s SURBHI AGRO appears as a bidder on 194 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 194 decided bids, it was awarded 123 — a 63.4% win rate — worth ₹1.2K Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 12 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is RCDF- MD, at 99.4% of what it has won, out of 2 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Rajasthan. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against M/S SAKHI, BABU LAL MOTI LAL and SUBHASH R KARWA. M/S SAKHI bid on 155 of the same tenders and won 144 of them; M/s SURBHI AGRO won 104.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.