Competitor profile

M/s Amit Engineers

They win 20% of what they bid, and 29% of the value they chase.

11tenders on record
1buyer authority
1state
25 Jun 2026last award
Total bids
10
11 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
2
7 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹2.1 Cr
of ₹7.1 Cr bid — 28.8% conversion
Win rate
20.0%
of 10 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count10 bids
20.0%
10.0%
70.0%
Awarded220.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected110.0%
Lost770.0%
By value₹7.1 Cr
28.8%
12.1%
59.1%
Awarded₹2.1 Cr28.8%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹86.6 L12.1%
Lost₹4.2 Cr59.1%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh
Uttar Pradesh₹2.1 Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
TANISHQ ENTERPRISES3 wins · 7 shared tenders
₹96.5 L
won head-to-head
02
JAI MAHAKAL CONSTRUCTION1 win · 2 shared tenders
₹10.5 L
won head-to-head
03
NIRMALA ENTERPRISES0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
JAI AMBEY CONSTRUCTION AND SUPPLIERS1 win · 2 shared tenders
₹1.6 Cr
won head-to-head
05
M/S MITTAL CONSTRUCTION CO.0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
06
sharma enterprises1 win · 1 shared tender
₹86.6 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedAmit Engineers awardedOthers

About M/s Amit Engineers

M/s Amit Engineers appears as a bidder on 11 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority in 1 state. Of its 10 decided bids, it was awarded 2 — a 20.0% win rate — worth ₹2.1 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 25 Jun 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is U.P. Projects Corporation Ltd., at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Uttar Pradesh. On priced bids, its median quote is 0.7% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against TANISHQ ENTERPRISES, JAI MAHAKAL CONSTRUCTION and NIRMALA ENTERPRISES. TANISHQ ENTERPRISES bid on 7 of the same tenders and won 3 of them; M/s Amit Engineers won 1.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.