Competitor profile

AMIT CONSTRUCTION

They win 5% of what they bid — and 26% of the value, so the bids they miss are the smaller ones.

61tenders on record
5buyer authorities
1state
16 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
61
61 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
3
57 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹11.6 Cr
of ₹44.9 Cr bid — 25.8% conversion
Win rate
4.9%
of 61 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count61 bids
93.4%
Awarded34.9%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected11.6%
Lost5793.4%
By value₹44.9 Cr
25.8%
71.5%
Awarded₹11.6 Cr25.8%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹1.2 Cr2.7%
Lost₹32.1 Cr71.5%

Where they win

3 authorities · 1 state

Operating states

LowHigh
Uttar Pradesh₹11.6 Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
NATIONAL TRADING COMPANY46 wins · 46 shared tenders
₹3.7 Cr
won head-to-head
02
RAM JI SINGH0 wins · 46 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
M/S MAA AMITA TRADERS8 wins · 8 shared tenders
₹1.7 Cr
won head-to-head
04
M/S AMARNATH PAL0 wins · 5 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
Sunil Garg and Co0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
M/S MANVI CONSTRUCTIONS0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedAMIT CONSTRUCTION awardedOthers

About AMIT CONSTRUCTION

AMIT CONSTRUCTION appears as a bidder on 61 government tenders on record, from 5 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 61 decided bids, it was awarded 3 — a 4.9% win rate — worth ₹11.6 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 16 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority, at 67.1% of what it has won, out of 3 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Uttar Pradesh. On priced bids, its median quote is 0.1% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against NATIONAL TRADING COMPANY, RAM JI SINGH and M/S MAA AMITA TRADERS. NATIONAL TRADING COMPANY bid on 46 of the same tenders and won 46 of them; AMIT CONSTRUCTION won 0.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.