Competitor profile

AMIT CHANDRA DAS

They win 58% of what they bid, but only 35% of the value — the bigger bids get away.

12tenders on record
3buyer authorities
1state
2 Jan 2026last award
Total bids
12
12 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
7
2 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹1.3 Cr
of ₹3.7 Cr bid — 35.0% conversion
Win rate
58.3%
of 12 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count12 bids
58.3%
25.0%
16.7%
Awarded758.3%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected325.0%
Lost216.7%
By value₹3.7 Cr
35.0%
41.8%
23.3%
Awarded₹1.3 Cr35.0%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹1.6 Cr41.8%
Lost₹87.1 L23.3%

Where they win

2 authorities · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Irrigation Department₹1.3 Cr100.0%

Operating states

LowHigh
Assam₹1.3 Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
Safikul Islam4 wins · 5 shared tenders
₹6
won head-to-head
02
RAFIQUL ISLAM4 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹5
won head-to-head
03
B K ENTERPRISE4 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹4
won head-to-head
04
BAHARUL ISLAM4 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹7
won head-to-head
05
MESER ALI AHMED4 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹4
won head-to-head
06
M/S A.B.H Infrastructure4 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹4
won head-to-head
Rival awardedAMIT CHANDRA awardedOthers

About AMIT CHANDRA DAS

AMIT CHANDRA DAS appears as a bidder on 12 government tenders on record, from 3 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 12 decided bids, it was awarded 7 — a 58.3% win rate — worth ₹1.3 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 2 Jan 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Irrigation Department, at 100.0% of what it has won, out of 2 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Assam. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against Safikul Islam, RAFIQUL ISLAM and B K ENTERPRISE. Safikul Islam bid on 5 of the same tenders and won 4 of them; AMIT CHANDRA DAS won 4.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.