Competitor profile

AMIT BAIRAGYA

They win 4% of what they bid, and 4% of the value they chase.

28tenders on record
1buyer authority
1state
8 Jun 2026last award
Total bids
28
28 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
1
27 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹1.5 L
of ₹40.8 L bid — 3.7% conversion
Win rate
3.6%
of 28 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count28 bids
96.4%
Awarded13.6%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost2796.4%
By value₹40.8 L
96.3%
Awarded₹1.5 L3.7%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹39.3 L96.3%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Zilla Parishad₹1.5 L100.0%

Operating states

LowHigh
West Bengal₹1.5 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
MOUSUMI ENTERPRISE0 wins · 23 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
02
MONDAL ENTERPRISE12 wins · 12 shared tenders
₹22.1 L
won head-to-head
03
ABDUL KHALEK MALITA0 wins · 5 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
MIR CONSTRUCTION4 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹3.7 L
won head-to-head
05
MILAN ART4 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹3.8 L
won head-to-head
06
JAKIR HOSSAIN MONDAL3 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹3.1 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedAMIT BAIRAGYA awardedOthers

Recent tenders awarded to AMIT BAIRAGYA

About AMIT BAIRAGYA

AMIT BAIRAGYA appears as a bidder on 28 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority in 1 state. Of its 28 decided bids, it was awarded 1 — a 3.6% win rate — worth ₹1.5 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 8 Jun 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Zilla Parishad, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from West Bengal. On priced bids, its median quote is 0.1% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against MOUSUMI ENTERPRISE, MONDAL ENTERPRISE and ABDUL KHALEK MALITA. MOUSUMI ENTERPRISE bid on 23 of the same tenders and won 0 of them; AMIT BAIRAGYA won 1.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.