Competitor profile

M/s Amir Construction

They win 73% of what they bid, and 68% of the value they chase.

30tenders on record
1buyer authority
1state
6 Mar 2026last award
Total bids
30
30 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
22
8 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹4.5 Cr
of ₹6.6 Cr bid — 68.2% conversion
Win rate
73.3%
of 30 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count30 bids
73.3%
26.7%
Awarded2273.3%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost826.7%
By value₹6.6 Cr
68.2%
31.8%
Awarded₹4.5 Cr68.2%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹2.1 Cr31.8%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh
Goa₹4.5 Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
M/s Nandana Kishore Constructions LLP1 win · 3 shared tenders
₹13.8 L
won head-to-head
02
Sham Construction0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
Shivanand Borkar0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
Skyler Enterprises1 win · 2 shared tenders
₹14.6 L
won head-to-head
05
SHRI EKNATH M NAVELKAR1 win · 1 shared tender
₹34.9 L
won head-to-head
06
M s BABA CONSTRUCTIONS0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedAmir Construction awardedOthers

About M/s Amir Construction

M/s Amir Construction appears as a bidder on 30 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority in 1 state. Of its 30 decided bids, it was awarded 22 — a 73.3% win rate — worth ₹4.5 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 6 Mar 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Goa. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against M/s Nandana Kishore Constructions LLP, Sham Construction and Shivanand Borkar. M/s Nandana Kishore Constructions LLP bid on 3 of the same tenders and won 1 of them; M/s Amir Construction won 2.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.