Competitor profile

M/S AMBUJ CONSTRUCTION

They win 50% of what they bid — and 68% of the value, so the bids they miss are the smaller ones.

4tenders on record
2buyer authorities
1state
31 Jul 2026last award
Total bids
4
4 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
2
2 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹1.3 Cr
of ₹1.8 Cr bid — 68.2% conversion
Win rate
50.0%
of 4 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count4 bids
50.0%
50.0%
Awarded250.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost250.0%
By value₹1.8 Cr
68.2%
31.8%
Awarded₹1.3 Cr68.2%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹58.5 L31.8%

Where they win

2 authorities · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh
Uttar Pradesh₹1.3 Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
M/S SUNITA ENTERPRISES1 win · 2 shared tenders
₹38.2 L
won head-to-head
02
M/S HARSH CONSTRUCTION0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
03
PRAMOD KUMAR SINGH0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
04
S P CONSTRUCTION COMPANY1 win · 1 shared tender
₹20.2 L
won head-to-head
05
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedAMBUJ CONSTRUCTION awardedOthers

About M/S AMBUJ CONSTRUCTION

M/S AMBUJ CONSTRUCTION appears as a bidder on 4 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 4 decided bids, it was awarded 2 — a 50.0% win rate — worth ₹1.3 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 31 Jul 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is U.P. Projects Corporation Ltd., at 62.0% of what it has won, out of 2 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Uttar Pradesh. On priced bids, its median quote is 0.1% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against M/S SUNITA ENTERPRISES, M/S HARSH CONSTRUCTION and PRAMOD KUMAR SINGH. M/S SUNITA ENTERPRISES bid on 2 of the same tenders and won 1 of them; M/S AMBUJ CONSTRUCTION won 1.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.