Competitor profile

M/s Amar Construction

They win 19% of what they bid — and 36% of the value, so the bids they miss are the smaller ones.

16tenders on record
1buyer authority
1state
21 Aug 2026last award
Total bids
16
16 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
3
13 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹1.0 Cr
of ₹2.9 Cr bid — 35.8% conversion
Win rate
18.8%
of 16 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count16 bids
18.8%
81.3%
Awarded318.8%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost1381.3%
By value₹2.9 Cr
35.7%
64.3%
Awarded₹1.0 Cr35.7%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹1.9 Cr64.3%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh
Maharashtra₹1.0 Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
₹1.1 Cr
won head-to-head
02
M/S PRAVIN CONSRUCTIONS1 win · 3 shared tenders
₹24.2 L
won head-to-head
03
M/S. SACHKHAND INFRASTRUCTURE2 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹34.1 L
won head-to-head
04
Eng Arjun Sanjay More1 win · 1 shared tender
₹10.8 L
won head-to-head
05
L AND S CONSTRUCTION0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
06
MAAZ CONSTRUCTION0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedAmar Construction awardedOthers

About M/s Amar Construction

M/s Amar Construction appears as a bidder on 16 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority in 1 state. Of its 16 decided bids, it was awarded 3 — a 18.8% win rate — worth ₹1.0 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 21 Aug 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Nanded Waghala City Municipal Corporation Nanded, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Maharashtra. On priced bids, its median quote is 4.2% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against MOHAMMED MEHROOZ FARHAN MOHAMMED MUNEER AHMED, M/S PRAVIN CONSRUCTIONS and M/S. SACHKHAND INFRASTRUCTURE. MOHAMMED MEHROOZ FARHAN MOHAMMED MUNEER AHMED bid on 10 of the same tenders and won 9 of them; M/s Amar Construction won 1.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.