Competitor profile

AMAN ENTERPRISES

They win 32% of what they bid, and 30% of the value they chase.

22tenders on record
5buyer authorities
1state
25 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
22
22 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
7
13 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹2.2 Cr
of ₹7.6 Cr bid — 29.5% conversion
Win rate
31.8%
of 22 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count22 bids
31.8%
59.1%
Awarded731.8%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected29.1%
Lost1359.1%
By value₹7.6 Cr
29.5%
21.7%
48.7%
Awarded₹2.2 Cr29.5%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹1.6 Cr21.7%
Lost₹3.7 Cr48.7%

Where they win

2 authorities · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh
Rajasthan₹2.2 Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
M/S NITIN GENERAL SUPPLIERS2 wins · 5 shared tenders
₹60.0 L
won head-to-head
02
Airtech Cooling Process Pvt. Ltd1 win · 3 shared tenders
₹27.6 L
won head-to-head
03
satish ramgopal mahar construction1 win · 3 shared tenders
₹25.0 L
won head-to-head
04
₹71.5 L
won head-to-head
05
BALAJI SUPPLIERS1 win · 2 shared tenders
₹25.0 L
won head-to-head
06
SHARP MINCHEM PRIVATE LIMITD0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedAMAN ENTERPRISES awardedOthers

About AMAN ENTERPRISES

AMAN ENTERPRISES appears as a bidder on 22 government tenders on record, from 5 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 22 decided bids, it was awarded 7 — a 31.8% win rate — worth ₹2.2 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 25 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Panchayati Raj Department, at 82.0% of what it has won, out of 2 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Rajasthan. On priced bids, its median quote is 1.0% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against M/S NITIN GENERAL SUPPLIERS, Airtech Cooling Process Pvt. Ltd and satish ramgopal mahar construction. M/S NITIN GENERAL SUPPLIERS bid on 5 of the same tenders and won 2 of them; AMAN ENTERPRISES won 3.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.