Competitor profile

ajit v patil

They win 33% of what they bid, but only 4% of the value — the bigger bids get away.

3tenders on record
2buyer authorities
1state
8 Aug 2026last award
Total bids
3
3 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
1
2 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹11.4 L
of ₹3.2 Cr bid — 3.6% conversion
Win rate
33.3%
of 3 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count3 bids
33.3%
66.7%
Awarded133.3%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost266.7%
By value₹3.2 Cr
96.4%
Awarded₹11.4 L3.6%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹3.0 Cr96.4%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh
Maharashtra₹11.4 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
M/S.ANAND ASSOCIATES0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
02
SANDEEP NIVRUTTI SAWANT0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
03
Guru Construction0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
04
tushar ulape1 win · 1 shared tender
₹1.5 Cr
won head-to-head
05
Shri. Balwant Sadashiv Patil1 win · 1 shared tender
₹1.5 Cr
won head-to-head
06
PRAVIN GOPAL KOLI0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedajit v patil awardedOthers

About ajit v patil

ajit v patil appears as a bidder on 3 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 3 decided bids, it was awarded 1 — a 33.3% win rate — worth ₹11.4 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 8 Aug 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Directorate Of Municipal Administration, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Maharashtra. On priced bids, its median quote is 2.0% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against M/S.ANAND ASSOCIATES, SANDEEP NIVRUTTI SAWANT and Guru Construction. M/S.ANAND ASSOCIATES bid on 1 of the same tender and won 0 of them; ajit v patil won 0.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.