Competitor profile

AJINKYA NAVNATH GHULE

They win 13% of what they bid, and 17% of the value they chase.

8tenders on record
1buyer authority
1state
2 Oct 2026last award
Total bids
8
8 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
1
7 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹17.9 L
of ₹1.0 Cr bid — 17.2% conversion
Win rate
12.5%
of 8 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count8 bids
12.5%
87.5%
Awarded112.5%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost787.5%
By value₹1.0 Cr
17.2%
82.8%
Awarded₹17.9 L17.2%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹86.2 L82.8%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh
Maharashtra₹17.9 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
Ajit Anantrao Vyavahare3 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹27.8 L
won head-to-head
02
RAJKUMAR RAMCHANDRA SHINDE1 win · 3 shared tenders
₹2,850
won head-to-head
03
Shreerang Namdeo Padawale0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
Shivrtna Majur Saha. Sanstha0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
₹0
won head-to-head
06
Kapil Majur Saha. Sanstha1 win · 2 shared tenders
₹10.9 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedAJINKYA NAVNATH awardedOthers

About AJINKYA NAVNATH GHULE

AJINKYA NAVNATH GHULE appears as a bidder on 8 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority in 1 state. Of its 8 decided bids, it was awarded 1 — a 12.5% win rate — worth ₹17.9 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 2 Oct 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Directorate Of Municipal Administration, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Maharashtra. On priced bids, its median quote is 2.2% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against Ajit Anantrao Vyavahare, RAJKUMAR RAMCHANDRA SHINDE and Shreerang Namdeo Padawale. Ajit Anantrao Vyavahare bid on 4 of the same tenders and won 3 of them; AJINKYA NAVNATH GHULE won 0.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.