Competitor profile

M/s Ajay kumar Garge

They win 21% of what they bid, and 18% of the value they chase.

90tenders on record
1buyer authority
0states
1 Oct 2026last award
Total bids
85
90 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
18
67 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹5.6 Cr
of ₹31.7 Cr bid — 17.8% conversion
Win rate
21.2%
of 85 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count85 bids
21.2%
78.8%
Awarded1821.2%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost6778.8%
By value₹31.7 Cr
17.8%
82.2%
Awarded₹5.6 Cr17.8%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹26.1 Cr82.2%

Where they win

1 authority · 0 states

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

18 awards on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
M/S Dharam Chand Lal Chand Jain1 win · 20 shared tenders
₹38.7 L
won head-to-head
02
M/S KAUTILYA GARG3 wins · 19 shared tenders
₹1.6 Cr
won head-to-head
03
M/s SUNIL ENTERPRISES4 wins · 19 shared tenders
₹1.1 Cr
won head-to-head
04
L AND J CONSTRUCTION CO.6 wins · 18 shared tenders
₹99.8 L
won head-to-head
05
M/S SHARMA ASSOCIATES9 wins · 17 shared tenders
₹2.5 Cr
won head-to-head
06
SNEH CORPORATION1 win · 17 shared tenders
₹45.7 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedAjay kumar awardedOthers

About M/s Ajay kumar Garge

M/s Ajay kumar Garge appears as a bidder on 90 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority on central and PSU portals. Of its 85 decided bids, it was awarded 18 — a 21.2% win rate — worth ₹5.6 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 1 Oct 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is E-IN-C BRANCH - MILITARY ENGINEER SERVICES, at 100.0% of what it has won. On priced bids, its median quote is 7.7% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against M/S Dharam Chand Lal Chand Jain, M/S KAUTILYA GARG and M/s SUNIL ENTERPRISES. M/S Dharam Chand Lal Chand Jain bid on 20 of the same tenders and won 1 of them; M/s Ajay kumar Garge won 6.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.