Competitor profile

Ajay Gupta

They win 50% of what they bid, but only 23% of the value — the bigger bids get away.

2tenders on record
1buyer authority
1state
29 Apr 2015last award
Total bids
2
2 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
1
1 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹5.3 L
of ₹23.3 L bid — 22.7% conversion
Win rate
50.0%
of 2 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count2 bids
50.0%
50.0%
Awarded150.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost150.0%
By value₹23.3 L
22.7%
77.3%
Awarded₹5.3 L22.7%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹18.0 L77.3%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

University Department₹5.3 L100.0%

Operating states

LowHigh
Jammu And Kashmir₹5.3 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
ABDUL HAMID MAHIR0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
02
SGF INFRA PVT LTD.0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
03
SUMIT KATYAL0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
04
GUPTA CONSTRUCTION CO1 win · 1 shared tender
₹15.4 L
won head-to-head
05
KAMA DEV0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
06
Pawan Kumar0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedAjay Gupta awardedOthers

Recent tenders awarded to Ajay Gupta

About Ajay Gupta

Ajay Gupta appears as a bidder on 2 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority in 1 state. Of its 2 decided bids, it was awarded 1 — a 50.0% win rate — worth ₹5.3 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 29 Apr 2015.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is University Department, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Jammu And Kashmir. On priced bids, its median quote is 8.4% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against ABDUL HAMID MAHIR, SGF INFRA PVT LTD. and SUMIT KATYAL. ABDUL HAMID MAHIR bid on 1 of the same tender and won 0 of them; Ajay Gupta won 1.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.