Competitor profile

Pawan Kumar

They win 24% of what they bid, and 19% of the value they chase.

17tenders on record
6buyer authorities
1state
12 Aug 2025last award
Total bids
17
17 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
4
10 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹24.3 L
of ₹1.3 Cr bid — 19.2% conversion
Win rate
23.5%
of 17 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count17 bids
23.5%
17.6%
58.8%
Awarded423.5%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected317.6%
Lost1058.8%
By value₹1.3 Cr
19.2%
22.4%
58.4%
Awarded₹24.3 L19.2%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹28.4 L22.4%
Lost₹74.1 L58.4%

Where they win

3 authorities · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

University Department₹13.9 L57.3%
DC-PDD₹9.4 L38.8%
FOREST DEPARTMENT₹94,0423.9%

Operating states

LowHigh

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
Mohammad Hanief2 wins · 5 shared tenders
₹16.8 L
won head-to-head
02
Janak Singh0 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
m/s sharma electricals1 win · 3 shared tenders
₹16.0 L
won head-to-head
04
M/s Mahesh Kotwal1 win · 3 shared tenders
₹5.2 L
won head-to-head
05
j k suppliers & contrctors0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
M/S RADHA KRISHAN GOVT CONTRACTOR1 win · 2 shared tenders
₹3.3 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedPawan Kumar awardedOthers

About Pawan Kumar

Pawan Kumar appears as a bidder on 17 government tenders on record, from 6 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 17 decided bids, it was awarded 4 — a 23.5% win rate — worth ₹24.3 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 12 Aug 2025.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is University Department, at 57.3% of what it has won, out of 3 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Jammu And Kashmir. On priced bids, its median quote is 6.8% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against Mohammad Hanief, Janak Singh and m/s sharma electricals. Mohammad Hanief bid on 5 of the same tenders and won 2 of them; Pawan Kumar won 1.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.