Competitor profile

AJAMIRA KHATUN

They win 33% of what they bid, and 31% of the value they chase.

40tenders on record
5buyer authorities
1state
3 Jun 2026last award
Total bids
40
40 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
13
23 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹3.6 Cr
of ₹11.5 Cr bid — 31.3% conversion
Win rate
32.5%
of 40 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count40 bids
32.5%
10.0%
57.5%
Awarded1332.5%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected410.0%
Lost2357.5%
By value₹11.5 Cr
31.3%
18.1%
50.6%
Awarded₹3.6 Cr31.3%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹2.1 Cr18.1%
Lost₹5.8 Cr50.6%

Where they win

5 authorities · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

ZILA PARISHAD PAKUR₹1.6 Cr44.5%
RWD EinC₹1.4 Cr38.0%
BCD EinC₹24.8 L6.9%

Operating states

LowHigh
Jharkhand₹3.6 Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
RAFIUL ISLAM3 wins · 10 shared tenders
₹1.7 Cr
won head-to-head
02
SHRAVAN KUMAR BHAGAT6 wins · 7 shared tenders
₹1.1 Cr
won head-to-head
03
NAJIBUL SHEKH4 wins · 6 shared tenders
₹44.1 L
won head-to-head
04
INTEKHAB ALAM2 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹1.3 Cr
won head-to-head
05
SHAILJA ENTERPRISES2 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹1.1 Cr
won head-to-head
06
AMAN TRADERS1 win · 3 shared tenders
₹10.1 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedAJAMIRA KHATUN awardedOthers

About AJAMIRA KHATUN

AJAMIRA KHATUN appears as a bidder on 40 government tenders on record, from 5 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 40 decided bids, it was awarded 13 — a 32.5% win rate — worth ₹3.6 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 3 Jun 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is ZILA PARISHAD PAKUR, at 44.5% of what it has won, out of 5 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Jharkhand. On priced bids, its median quote is 0.1% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against RAFIUL ISLAM, SHRAVAN KUMAR BHAGAT and NAJIBUL SHEKH. RAFIUL ISLAM bid on 10 of the same tenders and won 3 of them; AJAMIRA KHATUN won 6.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.