Competitor profile

INTEKHAB ALAM

They win 28% of what they bid, and 24% of the value they chase.

72tenders on record
6buyer authorities
1state
24 Jul 2026last award
Total bids
72
72 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
20
29 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹5.3 Cr
of ₹21.7 Cr bid — 24.3% conversion
Win rate
27.8%
of 72 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count72 bids
27.8%
31.9%
40.3%
Awarded2027.8%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected2331.9%
Lost2940.3%
By value₹21.7 Cr
24.3%
36.0%
39.7%
Awarded₹5.3 Cr24.3%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹7.8 Cr36.0%
Lost₹8.6 Cr39.7%

Where they win

5 authorities · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

ZILA PARISHAD PAKUR₹1.7 Cr31.4%
RDD Special Division₹1.6 Cr30.1%
BCD EinC₹86.6 L16.4%
RWD EinC₹63.1 L11.9%

Operating states

LowHigh
Jharkhand₹5.3 Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
ENJAMAMUL HAQUE2 wins · 18 shared tenders
₹49.5 L
won head-to-head
02
ISMAIL RAHMAN4 wins · 18 shared tenders
₹99.1 L
won head-to-head
03
SAHID EQBAL1 win · 16 shared tenders
₹17.0 L
won head-to-head
04
ALEKUL ALAM4 wins · 15 shared tenders
₹21.9 L
won head-to-head
05
KAMRUDDIN SAIKH3 wins · 15 shared tenders
₹2.2 Cr
won head-to-head
06
HABIBUR RAHAMAN1 win · 14 shared tenders
₹91.3 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedINTEKHAB ALAM awardedOthers

About INTEKHAB ALAM

INTEKHAB ALAM appears as a bidder on 72 government tenders on record, from 6 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 72 decided bids, it was awarded 20 — a 27.8% win rate — worth ₹5.3 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 24 Jul 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is ZILA PARISHAD PAKUR, at 31.4% of what it has won, out of 5 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Jharkhand. On priced bids, its median quote is 0.1% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against ENJAMAMUL HAQUE, ISMAIL RAHMAN and SAHID EQBAL. ENJAMAMUL HAQUE bid on 18 of the same tenders and won 2 of them; INTEKHAB ALAM won 3.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.