Competitor profile

AGARWAL MACHINERY STORE

They win 38% of what they bid, and 42% of the value they chase.

8tenders on record
1buyer authority
1state
21 Jun 2024last award
Total bids
8
8 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
3
3 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹85.5 L
of ₹2.0 Cr bid — 41.9% conversion
Win rate
37.5%
of 8 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count8 bids
37.5%
25.0%
37.5%
Awarded337.5%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected225.0%
Lost337.5%
By value₹2.0 Cr
41.8%
47.2%
10.9%
Awarded₹85.5 L41.8%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹96.5 L47.2%
Lost₹22.3 L10.9%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Forest - PCCF (HoFF)₹85.5 L100.0%

Operating states

LowHigh
Rajasthan₹85.5 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
ANKUR TRADERS0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
02
MITTAL CONSTRUCTION AND CONTRACTOR0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
m/s sunil kumar2 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹11.3 L
won head-to-head
04
YADAV CONSTRUCTION COMPANY1 win · 2 shared tenders
₹30.3 L
won head-to-head
05
shree shyam trading company0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
06
ARVIND ENTERPRISES0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedAGARWAL MACHINERY awardedOthers

Recent tenders awarded to AGARWAL MACHINERY

About AGARWAL MACHINERY STORE

AGARWAL MACHINERY STORE appears as a bidder on 8 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority in 1 state. Of its 8 decided bids, it was awarded 3 — a 37.5% win rate — worth ₹85.5 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 21 Jun 2024.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Forest - PCCF (HoFF), at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Rajasthan. On priced bids, its median quote is 0.9% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against ANKUR TRADERS, MITTAL CONSTRUCTION AND CONTRACTOR and m/s sunil kumar. ANKUR TRADERS bid on 3 of the same tenders and won 0 of them; AGARWAL MACHINERY STORE won 1.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.